A New Thermodynamics


By Kent W. Mayhew

Maxwell's Demon & Walls


Kent W. Mayhew


  In 1867 Maxwell presents his famous argument: As a consequence of kinetic theory of gases it was possible to transfer heat from cold to hot body without doing any work

this became known as:


Maxwell’s Demon (1):

  1) A vessel is divided into two parts:  Namely, Parts A and B   wherein  Part A is hotter than Part B

  2) The two parts are separated by a partition with small hole and shutter

   3) The shutter operates so that only fast molecules (Maxwell distribution) pass from Part B to Part A, and slow molecules pass from Part A to Part B


 Certainly, the above violates the second law, however the fact that someone/something must measure the molecule’s velocities, make a determination and then operate the shutter, really renders Maxwell’s Demon into a situation influenced by external controls, or if you prefer an external input.


  Even so, in the world of probabilities there remains a finite possibility that this occurs in nature. The reality is that this would only occur on a microscale, over a very small duration. Certainly for systems over a long duration, and on a macroscale, the result is that the net heat transfer is from hot to cold.


   Importantly the above statistical based argument depends upon the validity of Maxwell’s distribution for gases, which is really part of kinetic theory for gases. In my book, as well as my paper  “Latent Heat and Critical Temperature”(1), I discuss how walls influence what we know in thermodynamics. Specifically, without walls surrounding a gas then those gas molecules would not necessarily adhere to the kinetic theory. Of course the arguments in my book are more encompassing than those in my short paper.


  The point becomes; if kinetic theory falters without walls, then so does Maxwell’s distribution. Moreover, traditional statistical thermodynamics is all based upon systems surrounded by walls and elastic collisions. Certainly experiments need to be contained, hence walls are necessary, but we must begin to understand how a system’s walls influence our results. And in my papers on kinetic theory (2017 & 2018) and book I show that empirical findings are better explained by rewriting kinetic theory in terms of inelastic collisions.


  The above is not to say that heat now can flow from cold to hot on a regular basis. Common sense dictates that heat flows from hot to cold, without the using the seconds law nor entropy type arguments.I.e. it is temperature and not entropy that defines the direction of net heat flow. Like so much in traditional thermodynamic concepts, Maxwell’s demon needs a rethink!



Copyright Kent W. Mayhew



1) M.S. Longair . “Theoretical Concepts in Physics: An alternative View of Theoretical Reasoning in Physics”   Cambridge University Press  2003

2) https://www.academia.edu/7307615/Latent_Heat_and_Critical_Temperature 

Blog:Maxwell's Demon
thermowebsite3037017.jpg thermowebsite3037014.jpg thermowebsite3037012.jpg thermowebsite3037009.jpg thermowebsite3037008.jpg thermowebsite3037007.jpg thermowebsite3037005.jpg
Help support this site
 The following quote by Authur Eddington demonstrates the purity of human arrogance that can lend itself to the complete indoctrination of a poorly conceived science

“The law that entropy always increases, holds, I think, the supreme position among the laws of Nature. If someone points out to you that your pet theory of the universe is in disagreement with Maxwell's equations — then so much the worse for Maxwell's equations. If it is found to be contradicted by observation — well, these experimentalists do bungle things sometimes. But if your theory is found to be against the second law of thermodynamics I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation.”
This website is copyright of Kent W. Mayhew who in 2018 resides in Ottawa Ontario Canada
   This website is full of new ideas, which are the property of Kent W. Mayhew.  
    Furthermore you are free to share, copy or distribute in any manner that you feel is warranted, so long as you fully respectfully reference the author (Kent W. Mayhew) in a manner that you deem fit.